<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
>

<channel>
	<title>HDR &#8211; Wade Tregaskis</title>
	<atom:link href="https://wadetregaskis.com/tags/hdr/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://wadetregaskis.com</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 02 Dec 2023 21:13:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">226351702</site>	<item>
		<title>Lightroom &#8220;Classic&#8221; doesn&#8217;t play well with others</title>
		<link>https://wadetregaskis.com/lightroom-classic-doesnt-play-well-with-others/</link>
					<comments>https://wadetregaskis.com/lightroom-classic-doesnt-play-well-with-others/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Oct 2017 16:16:57 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Broken by design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bugs!]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HDR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lightroom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Time Machine]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://blog.wadetregaskis.com/?p=3972</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So far the new &#8220;Classic&#8221; Lightroom looks &#38; feels mostly identical to the prior version(s), which isn&#8217;t really a compliment, but could be worse. &#160;There&#8217;s no apparent performance improvements, that&#8217;s for sure, so as expected Adobe&#8217;s promises to suddenly learn how to write efficient &#38; performant software, well… at least their marketing department gave it&#8230; <a class="read-more-link" href="https://wadetregaskis.com/lightroom-classic-doesnt-play-well-with-others/" data-wpel-link="internal">Read more</a>]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<p>So far the new &#8220;Classic&#8221; Lightroom looks &amp; feels mostly identical to the prior version(s), which isn&#8217;t really a compliment, but could be worse. &nbsp;There&#8217;s no apparent performance improvements, that&#8217;s for sure, so as expected Adobe&#8217;s promises to suddenly learn how to write efficient &amp; performant software, well… at least their marketing department gave it the college try.</p>



<p>One thing I have very quickly discovered, however, is that Lightroom &#8220;Classic&#8221;&nbsp;<em>deliberately</em> chooses not to perform some functions if it is le tired. &nbsp;Or it thinks your computer is le tired. &nbsp;By which I mean, if there is pretty much&nbsp;<em>anything</em> else running and consuming CPU time (and/or RAM?), it refuses to even attempt some operations. &nbsp;HDR merges is the first one I hit. &nbsp;I was a bit flummoxed by it just happily queuing up a number of HDR merge operations, and them just sitting there in its queue, with no indication of error &#8211; just never executing.</p>



<p>Only after I quit or disabled a bunch of other processes &#8211; any and all that were using any measurable CPU time &#8211; did it finally, about ten seconds later, decide that it was now willing to consider my &#8216;requests&#8217;.</p>



<p>#%@!ing fussy little turd.</p>



<p>It&#8217;s worth noting that it&#8217;s not the only popular app, on macOS, that does this same bullshit. &nbsp;Time Machine is another big one. &nbsp;At least in Time Machine&#8217;s case I can see a more plausible line of reasoning behind it, even if it is misguided &#8211; the user&#8217;s&nbsp;<em>probably</em> not explicitly waiting for a Time Machine backup to complete. &nbsp;As in, not all the time. &nbsp;Sometimes they are. And they certainly expect backups to&nbsp;<em>happen at all</em>, which on a consistently busy machine simply&nbsp;<em>doesn&#8217;t</em> happen. &nbsp;So Time Machine&#8217;s reluctance to function on a working machine is still stupid overall. &nbsp;But Lightroom refusing to complete a&nbsp;<em>user initiated, user-interactive, and user-blocking</em> operation, is just patently stupid by its very notion.</p>



<p><strong>Update</strong>:  Worse, now it doesn&#8217;t work <em>at all</em>.  And a quick web search shows <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20200805043215/https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/lightroom-classic-cc-photo-merge-not-working-on-mac" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="external noopener">many</a> <a href="https://web.archive.org/web/20190604155342/https://feedback.photoshop.com/photoshop_family/topics/merge-to-hdr-simply-doesnt-work" data-wpel-link="external" target="_blank" rel="external noopener">other people</a> having the same problem, and Adobe as usual doing nothing about it.</p>



<p>Incidentally, I tried to log in to Adobe&#8217;s forums in order to &#8216;Me too&#8217; those issues, only it won&#8217;t let me log in anymore, falsely claiming my password is invalid. &nbsp;Good job, Adobe, good job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://wadetregaskis.com/lightroom-classic-doesnt-play-well-with-others/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3972</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
